Not in fine shape tends to mean less than stellar. I don't know how it could be much finer for prohm unless he had like Shaq or somethingAnd who said bare?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not in fine shape tends to mean less than stellar. I don't know how it could be much finer for prohm unless he had like Shaq or somethingAnd who said bare?
Cool, so you are judging Prohm basically off of 2 years with his own guys?Prohms first team was loaded and those were Hoibergs guys... can’t really be argued.
No one said bare.Not in fine shape tends to mean less than stellar. I don't know how it could be much finer for prohm unless he had like Shaq or something
No, he gets credit for all 4....Cool, so you are judging Prohm basically off of 2 years with his own guys?
Why does Barta's inbox get flooded by Iowa fans after a couple of seasons where Kirk basically matched his career average but not get flooded when Fran does the same thing?Sorry for taking this thread off the rails guys....
6 days left!!!
Prohms first team was loaded and those were Hoibergs guys... can’t really be argued.
Prohms first team was loaded and those were Hoibergs guys... can’t really be argued.
I’m sure he gets flooded with Fran hate...Why does Barta's inbox get flooded by Iowa fans after a couple of seasons where Kirk basically matched his career average but not get flooded when Fran does the same thing?
Link?I’m sure he gets flooded with Fran hate...
There's a ton of dipshits in here saying it wasn't loaded. It doesn't diminish prohms accomplishments, it's just realistic. Most jobs don't have turnover where someone inherits 6-8 future prosWhere did I say it wasn't loaded. What I am saying is if you are measuring a coaches effectiveness on whether or not they flamed out in a tourney and how bad that flame out was, CSP >> Hoiberg.
Bottom line, one program is flirting with the talent and teams to consistently make a mark in the post season, under current and previous coach. The other program hopes to sniff the post season occasionally.
I’d say we have a hell of a coachSo in all of this trolling what are your thoughts on a college football coach that averages 7-8 wins/season with a bunch of NFL talent that the fanbase squawks about?
Really not doing much?
Who said that?There's a ton of dipshits in here saying it wasn't loaded. It doesn't diminish prohms accomplishments, it's just realistic. Most jobs don't have turnover where someone inherits 6-8 future pros
Go submit a FOIA requestLink?
Aren't emails open record?
So in all of this trolling what are your thoughts on a college football coach that averages 7-8 wins/season with a bunch of NFL talent that the fanbase squawks about?
Really not doing much?
Not in phenomenal shape means it wasn't good. Idk how you look at a top 10 team and say not phenomenal. So youWho said that?