All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

[jmb]

Gun to my head, I would say Purdy. Stanley has a lot of talent, but is too inconsistent.

That is fair.

 

[CyTwins]

I would say Purdy.

At least you're all not dumb

 

[Shawker]

I think some of you are underestimating the impact losing Butler and Montgomery will have on Purdy. They provided him with a huge safety net. Not saying he can't replicate last season without them, but a lot of people on here seem to think it's a foregone conclusion that Purdy won't be impacted by their loss. Plus, once teams had some tape on Purdy his numbers went way down. Take each team's last 4 games:

Purdy
935 yards, 3 TD’s, 5 INT’s, 140.58 QB rating
33 rushes, 56 yards, 3 TD’s

Stanley
813 yards, 9 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 145.48 QB rating
12 rushes, 0 yards, 0 TD’s

For anyone asking here's the team defense rankings of their opponents in those games:

Purdy: 58, 97, N/A, 42

Stanley: 41, 124, 88, 2

Stanley > Purdy

/thread

 

[CyTwins]

I think some of you are underestimating the impact losing Butler and Montgomery will have on Purdy. They provided him with a huge safety net. Not saying he can't replicate last season without them, but a lot of people on here seem to think it's a foregone conclusion that Purdy won't be impacted by their loss. Plus, once teams had some tape on Purdy his numbers went way down. Take each team's last 4 games:

Purdy
935 yards, 3 TD’s, 5 INT’s, 140.58 QB rating
33 rushes, 56 yards, 3 TD’s

Stanley
813 yards, 9 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 145.48 QB rating
12 rushes, 0 yards, 0 TD’s

For anyone asking here's the team defense rankings of their opponents in those games:

Purdy: 58, 97, N/A, 42

Stanley: 41, 124, 88, 2

Stanley > Purdy

/thread

 

[CyTwins]

I think some of you are underestimating the impact losing Butler and Montgomery will have on Purdy. They provided him with a huge safety net. Not saying he can't replicate last season without them, but a lot of people on here seem to think it's a foregone conclusion that Purdy won't be impacted by their loss. Plus, once teams had some tape on Purdy his numbers went way down. Take each team's last 4 games:

Purdy
935 yards, 3 TD’s, 5 INT’s, 140.58 QB rating
33 rushes, 56 yards, 3 TD’s

Stanley
813 yards, 9 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 145.48 QB rating
12 rushes, 0 yards, 0 TD’s

For anyone asking here's the team defense rankings of their opponents in those games:

Purdy: 58, 97, N/A, 42

Stanley: 41, 124, 88, 2

Stanley > Purdy

/thread

I think some of you are underestimating the impact losing Fant and Hockenson will have on Stanley. They provided him with a huge safety net and he still wasn't good even with them. Not saying he can't replicate last season's mediocre numbers without them, but a lot of people on here seem to think it's a foregone conclusion that Stanley won't be impacted by their loss.

 

[IASTATE07]

Gun to my head, I would say Purdy. Stanley has a lot of talent, but is too inconsistent.

What if the gunman was wanting you to say Stanley?

 

[CyTwins]

Ehh, not including Pettway, ISU has a pretty good pair of receivers.

How did you disagree with this @benjimill? You don't think Milton and Jones are good?

 

[JSS]

@CyTwins regarding the pre-season Mackey Award watch list:

Surprised Hockenson made it. Allen and Fant were no brainers

Oof!

 

[JSS]

I think some of you are underestimating the impact losing Butler and Montgomery will have on Purdy. They provided him with a huge safety net. Not saying he can't replicate last season without them, but a lot of people on here seem to think it's a foregone conclusion that Purdy won't be impacted by their loss. Plus, once teams had some tape on Purdy his numbers went way down. Take each team's last 4 games:

Purdy
935 yards, 3 TD’s, 5 INT’s, 140.58 QB rating
33 rushes, 56 yards, 3 TD’s

Stanley
813 yards, 9 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 145.48 QB rating
12 rushes, 0 yards, 0 TD’s

For anyone asking here's the team defense rankings of their opponents in those games:

Purdy: 58, 97, N/A, 42

Stanley: 41, 124, 88, 2

Stanley > Purdy

/thread

Why do quarterbacks regress so much under Campbell?

 

[TheJackWePack5]

Why do quarterbacks regress so much under Campbell?

This is an interesting troll.

 

[CyTwins]

@CyTwins regarding the pre-season Mackey Award watch list:

Oof!

Yeah replacing Hockenson is going to be impossible for you guys. He will be missed badly

 

[JSS]

Yeah replacing Hockenson is going to be impossible for you guys. He will be missed badly

Can you believe how bad of a take that was?

 

[inCyteful]

I think some of you are underestimating the impact losing Butler and Montgomery will have on Purdy. They provided him with a huge safety net. Not saying he can't replicate last season without them, but a lot of people on here seem to think it's a foregone conclusion that Purdy won't be impacted by their loss. Plus, once teams had some tape on Purdy his numbers went way down. Take each team's last 4 games:

Purdy
935 yards, 3 TD’s, 5 INT’s, 140.58 QB rating
33 rushes, 56 yards, 3 TD’s

Stanley
813 yards, 9 TD’s, 2 INT’s, 145.48 QB rating
12 rushes, 0 yards, 0 TD’s

For anyone asking here's the team defense rankings of their opponents in those games:

Purdy: 58, 97, N/A, 42

Stanley: 41, 124, 88, 2

Stanley > Purdy

/thread

Which loss will hurt the QB more -

Butler
Fant/Hackenson

 

[CyTwins]

Can you believe how bad of a take that was?

It was really bad. Not as bad as your Shayok take but it was bad. Hockenson was a stud

 

[JSS]

It was really bad. Not as bad as your Shayok take but it was bad. Hockenson was a stud

Never made a take on Shayok, buddy.

 

[cycloner29]

@CyTwins regarding the pre-season Mackey Award watch list:

A Goof!

FIFY- as this is what you are!!

 

[JSS]

FIFY- as this is what you are!!

 

[CyTwins]

Never made a take on Shayok, buddy.

What was your last username then if you weren't @YeahBuddy?

 

[JSS]

What was your last username then if you weren't @YeahBuddy?

 

[CyTwins]

You were definitely @YeahBuddy, you're not fooling anyone. The Shayok take was the worst thing I've read on here