My bad, he is 1st in turnovers forced, only 2nd in interceptions. He’s been really good.
All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition
- Thread starter YeahBuddy
- Start date
My bad, he is 1st in turnovers forced, only 2nd in interceptions. He’s been really good.
Thanks. It's easier to just assume Benji is wrong all the time than look it up to confirm it
Lol at thinking SOS is directly correlated to quality of defense. Not even you can be dumb or trolly enough to think that.
He’s been hampered by a thumb injury since the Penn St. game, but he certainly has not improved his consistency like you would hope.
He’s the third option on a run first team, behind two elite TEs. Of course he’s not going to have a ton of catches. Derp.
Give me Jones and Milton ahead of him, even Easley is better even though Easley plays against a poor SOS
He should catch teams without safety help over the top, which means he should be averaging 20+ yards a catch.
I don't think you know what "funny" means if you think this post is funny. All 3 of the guys listed have better numbers than Smith
Why do you guys even debate with these trolls? The stats don't lie.
Sagarin ratings of teams played in past years :
EIU
2013 - 143 Missouri State
2014 - 70 Ball State
2015 - 144 North Texas
2016 - 180 North Texas
2017 - 146 North Texas
2018 - 78 Northern Iowa
Iowa State
2013 - 47 Tulsa
2014 - 17 North Dakota State
2015 - 73 Toledo
2016 - 94 San Jose State
2017 - 104 Akron
2018 - 63 South Dakota State > 192 Drake > 240 Incarnate Word
In the past 6 years the average rating of a "gimme game" at the beginning of the year :
Iowa - 126.8
ISU - 66.3 (with SDSU in 2018)
or 87.3 (with drake in 2018)
If you look at the 2016 UNT game (180) and 2011 TTU game (182), the average rating was comparable to drake(192). Not only that, but these weren't makeup games, these were intentionally scheduled years in advance.
------------------------------------
As for the QB Comparison :
College Football Total QBR - 2018 Season Leaders (espn)
14 Brock Purdy, ISU 39.0 7.9 -8.8 1.6 39.9 285 76.5 79.5
29 Nate Stanley, IOWA 48.0 1.4 -7.5 3.1 44.8 432 67.5 74.4
NCAA Player Stats - QB Comp (teamrankings.com)
Stanley
Comp.% - 58.46
Yards/Att. - 7.20
TD% - 6.28
Int.% - 2.45
NCAA QB Rating - 134.83
Purdy
Comp.% - 66.08
Yards/Att. - 10.42
TD% - 8.77
Int.% - 2.92
NCAA QB Rating - 176.71
Purdy >>>>> Stanley
(MIC DROP)
Sagarin ratings of teams played in past years :
EIU
2013 - 143 Missouri State
2014 - 70 Ball State
2015 - 144 North Texas
2016 - 180 North Texas
2017 - 146 North Texas
2018 - 78 Northern Iowa
Iowa State
2013 - 47 Tulsa
2014 - 17 North Dakota State
2015 - 73 Toledo
2016 - 94 San Jose State
2017 - 104 Akron
2018 - 63 South Dakota State > 192 Drake > 240 Incarnate Word
In the past 6 years the average rating of a "gimme game" at the beginning of the year :
Iowa - 126.8
ISU - 66.3 (with SDSU in 2018)
or 87.3 (with drake in 2018)
If you look at the 2016 UNT game (180) and 2011 TTU game (182), the average rating was comparable to drake(192). Not only that, but these weren't makeup games, these were intentionally scheduled years in advance.
------------------------------------
As for the QB Comparison :
College Football Total QBR - 2018 Season Leaders (espn)
14 Brock Purdy, ISU 39.0 7.9 -8.8 1.6 39.9 285 76.5 79.5
29 Nate Stanley, IOWA 48.0 1.4 -7.5 3.1 44.8 432 67.5 74.4
NCAA Player Stats - QB Comp (teamrankings.com)
Stanley
Comp.% - 58.46
Yards/Att. - 7.20
TD% - 6.28
Int.% - 2.45
NCAA QB Rating - 134.83
Purdy
Comp.% - 66.08
Yards/Att. - 10.42
TD% - 8.77
Int.% - 2.92
NCAA QB Rating - 176.71
Purdy >>>>> Stanley
(MIC DROP)
[QUOTE="hall4cy, post: 6413326, member: 4998"]Why do you guys even debate with these trolls? The stats don't lie.
Sagarin ratings of teams played in past years :
EIU
2013 - 143 Missouri State
2014 - 70 Ball State
2015 - 144 North Texas
2016 - 180 North Texas
2017 - 146 North Texas
2018 - 78 Northern Iowa
Iowa State
2013 - 47 Tulsa
2014 - 17 North Dakota State
2015 - 73 Toledo
2016 - 94 San Jose State
2017 - 104 Akron
2018 - 63 South Dakota State > 192 Drake > 240 Incarnate Word
In the past 6 years the average rating of a "gimme game" at the beginning of the year :
Iowa - 126.8
ISU - 66.3 (with SDSU in 2018)
or 87.3 (with drake in 2018)
If you look at the 2016 UNT game (180) and 2011 TTU game (182), the average rating was comparable to drake(192). Not only that, but these weren't makeup games, these were intentionally scheduled years in advance.
------------------------------------
As for the QB Comparison :
College Football Total QBR - 2018 Season Leaders (espn)
14 Brock Purdy, ISU 39.0 7.9 -8.8 1.6 39.9 285 76.5 79.5
29 Nate Stanley, IOWA 48.0 1.4 -7.5 3.1 44.8 432 67.5 74.4
NCAA Player Stats - QB Comp (teamrankings.com)
Stanley
Comp.% - 58.46
Yards/Att. - 7.20
TD% - 6.28
Int.% - 2.45
NCAA QB Rating - 134.83
Purdy
Comp.% - 66.08
Yards/Att. - 10.42
TD% - 8.77
Int.% - 2.92
NCAA QB Rating - 176.71
Purdy >>>>> Stanley
(MIC DROP)
[/QUOTE]
My answer to your first question is I'm bored.
Sagarin ratings of teams played in past years :
EIU
2013 - 143 Missouri State
2014 - 70 Ball State
2015 - 144 North Texas
2016 - 180 North Texas
2017 - 146 North Texas
2018 - 78 Northern Iowa
Iowa State
2013 - 47 Tulsa
2014 - 17 North Dakota State
2015 - 73 Toledo
2016 - 94 San Jose State
2017 - 104 Akron
2018 - 63 South Dakota State > 192 Drake > 240 Incarnate Word
In the past 6 years the average rating of a "gimme game" at the beginning of the year :
Iowa - 126.8
ISU - 66.3 (with SDSU in 2018)
or 87.3 (with drake in 2018)
If you look at the 2016 UNT game (180) and 2011 TTU game (182), the average rating was comparable to drake(192). Not only that, but these weren't makeup games, these were intentionally scheduled years in advance.
------------------------------------
As for the QB Comparison :
College Football Total QBR - 2018 Season Leaders (espn)
14 Brock Purdy, ISU 39.0 7.9 -8.8 1.6 39.9 285 76.5 79.5
29 Nate Stanley, IOWA 48.0 1.4 -7.5 3.1 44.8 432 67.5 74.4
NCAA Player Stats - QB Comp (teamrankings.com)
Stanley
Comp.% - 58.46
Yards/Att. - 7.20
TD% - 6.28
Int.% - 2.45
NCAA QB Rating - 134.83
Purdy
Comp.% - 66.08
Yards/Att. - 10.42
TD% - 8.77
Int.% - 2.92
NCAA QB Rating - 176.71
Purdy >>>>> Stanley
(MIC DROP)
[/QUOTE]
My answer to your first question is I'm bored.
IMO, he is capable of moving all over and the best end on the field for either team. I believe most of these hawks would give you a dazed look if you started talking press and cut corners (probably don't even know basic strong and free safety differences in their base 4-3 cover 2) so I just go with their best player period. We are already arguing with mental midgets, I try not to get too deep into the weeds with them.