Ferentz's Emphasis on the ISU Game
- Thread starter CyTwins
- Start date
Link to what computer models you used before the game Saturday?
I disagree with your insinuation that Michigan only looked good because Wisconsin is meh. I think Michigan is legit.
You said Sagarin has them right at 19th and that takes SOS into their rankings...
Seriously though, what the **** kind of loser does benj have to truly be when his whole life is spent on a fan board for a team he proclaims to not care about?
I mean this moron has registered here over and over again to pretend he doesn’t care about Iowa State.
You are truly a loser. A real jackass.
I mean this moron has registered here over and over again to pretend he doesn’t care about Iowa State.
You are truly a loser. A real jackass.
You asked how they could win games if they are soft. I told you it’s because they haven’t played anyone good. Not that hard to figure out.
WVU was criminally overrated at #6, they will be lucky to be in the top 20 by the end of the year. Kind of like how Wisconsin was criminally overrated when they were #4 or 5 or however high they were.
Yes it is. Well documented on here how good their defensive efficiency numbers were last week actually. Blum wrote an article about it too IIRC
Yet they still kicked Iowa’s ass. Drove the ball down your throats 90+ yards to beat you again.
You claim Iowa’s SOS is weak and it is much higher than West Virginia’s. So which is true- Iowa’s SOS is actually pretty decent, or you are actually just trolling? Because if you don’t think West Virginia’s SOS is bad, there is no possible way to reconcile your previous statements unless you are trolling.
I did watch that along with Wisconsin and Michigan. I thought both games were pretty boring.
I never said WVU's SOS is good. I'm asking how you can say a team that was ranked in the top 10 in most computer models going into the ISU game was soft when you have never seen them play