Iowa Football Recruiting

LOL! I dont.
20171112_140926.jpg

Habitual liar that yeahbuddy is!! First a promise to quit trolling and now this?
 
No, 42.69.

Unless I keyed a number wrong on the calculator. 555/13 is what I came up with.

Wyoming - 73
Iowa State - 25
North Texas - 101
Penn State - 4
Michigan State - 23
Illinois - 126
Northwestern - 20
Minnesota - 62
Ohio State - 2
Wisconsin - 7
Purdue - 37
Nebraska - 75
Boston College - 36

Actually comes out to be 45.46
 
Wyoming - 73
Iowa State - 25
North Texas - 101
Penn State - 4
Michigan State - 23
Illinois - 126
Northwestern - 20
Minnesota - 62
Ohio State - 2
Wisconsin - 7
Purdue - 37
Nebraska - 75
Boston College - 36

Actually comes out to be 45.46
Remember that ISU is the stem college, Iowa is the liberal arts college. Their math is a little weaker.
 
Wyoming - 73
Iowa State - 25
North Texas - 101
Penn State - 4
Michigan State - 23
Illinois - 126
Northwestern - 20
Minnesota - 62
Ohio State - 2
Wisconsin - 7
Purdue - 37
Nebraska - 75
Boston College - 36

Actually comes out to be 45.46

My bad, I forgot to add in the BC number. I was taking the 555 from the regular season and dividing it by 13.
 
My bad, I forgot to add in the BC number. I was taking the 555 from the regular season and dividing it by 13.

No problem. Like I said Kempt put up better numbers against tougher competition so you either hate Kempt or are extremely biased
 
He had a better QB rating, thats about it. And had better WR's to throw to.

You know that judges everything a QB does except for fumbling right (luckily for Stanley or his would have been worse). ISU had better WR's but you already said Iowa had a better OL and TE's so it's a push
 
You know that judges everything a QB does except for fumbling right (luckily for Stanley or his would have been worse). ISU had better WR's but you already said Iowa had a better OL and TE's so it's a push

You disagree on the OL assessment though and thought ISU had a better OL.
 
You disagree on the OL assessment though and thought ISU had a better OL.

I'll go ahead and agree with you for the sake of this argument. Like I said Kempt had better numbers (by quite a large margin actually) while playing a tougher schedule. Not really any sane person can argue he's not the best QB in the state now. If you want to say you think Stanley has a higher ceiling that I will let you roll with but with what we know now it's apparent Kempt is the guy
 
I'll go ahead and agree with you for the sake of this argument. Like I said Kempt had better numbers (by quite a large margin actually) while playing a tougher schedule. Not really any sane person can argue he's not the best QB in the state now. If you want to say you think Stanley has a higher ceiling that I will let you roll with but with what we know now it's apparent Kempt is the guy
There are 3 betters at osu and one at isu that are better than Stanley. Winning!
 
Please explain what you were “discussing” with your Twitter post? You discussed NOTHING!! You cut and pasted a tweet that again like many of your posts means absolutely nothing to CF folks on here. Don’t bring up your “ it deals with ISR.” Your normal comeback. If you are going to continue your garbage type posts, maybe you should opt out.

Still waiting for your answer/explanation @YeahBuddy......
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron