LOL! I dont.
Habitual liar that yeahbuddy is!! First a promise to quit trolling and now this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL! I dont.
No, 42.69.
Unless I keyed a number wrong on the calculator. 555/13 is what I came up with.
Remember that ISU is the stem college, Iowa is the liberal arts college. Their math is a little weaker.Wyoming - 73
Iowa State - 25
North Texas - 101
Penn State - 4
Michigan State - 23
Illinois - 126
Northwestern - 20
Minnesota - 62
Ohio State - 2
Wisconsin - 7
Purdue - 37
Nebraska - 75
Boston College - 36
Actually comes out to be 45.46
Wyoming - 73
Iowa State - 25
North Texas - 101
Penn State - 4
Michigan State - 23
Illinois - 126
Northwestern - 20
Minnesota - 62
Ohio State - 2
Wisconsin - 7
Purdue - 37
Nebraska - 75
Boston College - 36
Actually comes out to be 45.46
My bad, I forgot to add in the BC number. I was taking the 555 from the regular season and dividing it by 13.
No problem. Like I said Kempt put up better numbers against tougher competition so you either hate Kempt or are extremely biased
He had a better QB rating, thats about it. And had better WR's to throw to.
You know that judges everything a QB does except for fumbling right (luckily for Stanley or his would have been worse). ISU had better WR's but you already said Iowa had a better OL and TE's so it's a push
You disagree on the OL assessment though and thought ISU had a better OL.
There are 3 betters at osu and one at isu that are better than Stanley. Winning!I'll go ahead and agree with you for the sake of this argument. Like I said Kempt had better numbers (by quite a large margin actually) while playing a tougher schedule. Not really any sane person can argue he's not the best QB in the state now. If you want to say you think Stanley has a higher ceiling that I will let you roll with but with what we know now it's apparent Kempt is the guy
There are 3 betters at osu and one at isu that are better than Stanley. Winning!
Hold your breath. PleaseStill waiting for a link on this.
Please explain what you were “discussing” with your Twitter post? You discussed NOTHING!! You cut and pasted a tweet that again like many of your posts means absolutely nothing to CF folks on here. Don’t bring up your “ it deals with ISR.” Your normal comeback. If you are going to continue your garbage type posts, maybe you should opt out.
Still waiting for a link on this.
Will you finally admit Kempt is better than Stanley after seeing the new numbers?