I'd actually consider Montgomery just as a full on football player. That's A LOT to do on your own last season.
ISU would have to go undefeated and win by like 3 TD's a game as he rushed for 2,500 yards though.
My Pledge—No More Trolling
- Thread starter YeahBuddy
- Start date
I'd actually consider Montgomery just as a full on football player. That's A LOT to do on your own last season.
ISU would have to go undefeated and win by like 3 TD's a game as he rushed for 2,500 yards though.
Montgomery was better than Barkley last year according to PFF which @YeahBuddy referenced yesterday so you might be right about Montgomery
Kempt didn’t get to play the non-cons like Stanley did.
And I think the games he won (OU, TCU, Memphis) are all better than Stanley’s top wins (OSU, Minny, BC). To be honest Iowa beating ISU is probably their 2nd best win of the year and I don’t think that’s debatable.
That’s actually a fact. Iowa played a harder schedule than Iowa State last year.
I don’t know, I would say the future 1st round draft pick and best TE in college football is probably the best player in the state. Montgomery is up there, though.
Except Iowa was ranked higher by pretty much every metric, so that can’t be it.
Stop moving the goal posts. First we aren’t to use stats and metrics, now we are supposed to?
What a surprise! The metrics are valid when they agree with your viewpoint.
Benji should stick with what he knows...being a movie pooch from the 70's.
Most of his posts are what the mutt produced after a big feeding.
You’re not very good at this. I just pointed out that QBR is pretty widely considered to be a poor rating system. I had no issue with others who posted QB Efficiency Rating, which also scored Kempt higher. I think a combination of the eye test and statistics are the way to go; I understand that runs counter to the CyFan hive mind, which thinks statistics are the only thing that matters.
Besides, Iowa having a better strength of schedule has little to do with Stanley being a better QB than Kempt.