***Big 10 Thread***

BTN homers really reaching for statistical greatness in mentioning how Rutgers is the first 14 seed to reach the Big Ten quarterfinals.
I don't think I'd be highlighting that if I were them. That only shows just how weak their conference is. Imagine if Iola had won vs UM - would have been a total embarrassment for that league.
 
I don't think I'd be highlighting that if I were them. That only shows just how weak their conference is. Imagine if Iola had won vs UM - would have been a total embarrassment for that league.

They were trying to play if off as a sign of strength for the conference.

While I do think the (real) best 4 of the Big Ten are actually good teams, that network refuses to acknowledge the actual records of its teams. They couldn't get enough of the young talent of Iowa's veteran team.

The BTN's drama obsession is similar to ESPN's obsession with drama with NBA teams that are shoe ins for the playoffs.
 
Already mentioned, but Nebraska's precarious bubble position is now solidified as NIT-bound.

Only quality win (vs. U-M, at home) for the most part canceled by losing to Michigan.

Penn State survived another day, but PSU's only notable wins are over Ohio State -- 3 times. How BPI has Penn State in top 30 is beyond me -- its low RPI (hovering around 80) is probably too extreme the other way, it's probably somewhere between the two.

Big Ten is a 4-team at-large conference.
 
  • Creative
Reactions: CRcyclone6
Already mentioned, but Nebraska's precarious bubble position is now solidified as NIT-bound.

Only quality win (vs. U-M, at home) for the most part canceled by losing to Michigan.

Penn State survived another day, but PSU's only notable wins are over Ohio State -- 3 times. How BPI has Penn State in top 30 is beyond me -- its low RPI (hovering around 80) is probably too extreme the other way, it's probably somewhere between the two.

Big Ten is a 4-team at-large conference.

Yeah, I see that the media is saying Penn State is in with that win. I'm not sure I agree. I think they need another one.
 
His post history is great. Ragumba a future lock down NFL corner is up there but a lot of them start out with "Listen I hate Iowa more than anyone but....then goes on to defend all their players or how tough the Big Ten is"


Posts like that certainly have a Dognutty flavor to them.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: VeloClone
http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...wkeyes-mindset-during-rough-season/385197002/

One of the offseason changes Iowa players plan to make: How they approach outside noise.

The Hawkeyes admitted negative comments on social media had an affect on their mentality as a disappointing season wore on. Iowa finished 14-19 overall, with a 4-14 record in regular-season Big Ten play. Its only win against a top-100 RPI opponent was against Colorado in December.

“People can say some crazy things, and it can affect you mentally,” sophomore forward Cordell Pemsl said. “With the way we were playing, it was hard for us.”

Fellow sophomore Ryan Kriener was even more direct.

“The toughest thing is when you go online after the game, it feels like everyone and their mom is saying you suck,” Kriener said. “You’ve got people saying all this stuff and asking these awful questions that are completely irrelevant. Just sticking the course, just making sure you’re doing the right thing, that’s the toughest part.”


Kriener’s words are a good lesson that Twitter can be a toxic place, and that there’s no place for personally attacking college athletes.

And before you get on a kid for looking at his mentions, avoiding them is not as easy as it sounds in today’s world, when smartphones have become so crucial to connecting to others' everyday life.

“We’re all ready to move on and prepare for next season and try and make our own expectations,” Pemsl said, “and maybe not focus on what other people are saying.”
 
Last edited:

Help Support Us

Become a patron