All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

Also, am I missing something? ESPN shows 258 carries for 1146 yards (4.4/car) and 11 TD for Monty, and 252 for 1109 (4.4) and 10 TD for Wadley. Are their stats wrong?

I said total yards. Wadley is a complete back and dangerous out of the backfield as a receiver. Montgomery is pretty one dimensional and would be hard to trust during crunch time given he almost fumbled away a bowl victory.
 
A RSFr that was coming off of an ACL tear? Why is that surprising? Noland looked just fine in his playing time and will have all offseason to continue to improve.

Not saying he won't be good, but I wouldn't say he was that impressive against a terrible OSU defense. He did throw a ball up for grabs at a very critical time in the game that resulted in a game clinching INT for OSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YeahBuddy
I said total yards. Wadley is a complete back and dangerous out of the backfield as a receiver. Montgomery is pretty one dimensional and would be hard to trust during crunch time given he almost fumbled away a bowl victory.
Suddenly a difference of 50 receiving yards makes one "not a complete back"... Alright. Namely when one of the receptions for Wadley was a 68-yarder against powerhouse North Texas and another was 70 yards in a losing effort to Penn State (clutch).

How many fumbles did Wadley lose this year? I know for fact that Montgomery (and the entire team, for that matter) lost only one [:(].
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isu2014
Not saying he won't be good, but I wouldn't say he was that impressive against a terrible OSU defense. He did throw a ball up for grabs at a very critical time in the game that resulted in a game clinching INT for OSU.
That was a bad decision, no doubt. Not surprised as it was his first major playing time.

And calling the OSU defense "terrible" might be a stretch. Noland threw for right about the average of what OSU gave up per game passing in just over 3 quarters of PT, not bad considering OSU played against some of the best passing offenses in the country.
 
Beat a ranked Memphis in bowl game. Rankings don’t mean anything.
My team is very good & better than yours! - see their ranking?
Wadley didn’t sniff any All-B1G teams, DM was 1st team all-conference.

Total passing offense: ISU 30th
Total passing offense: Hocks 93rd

I really think Iowa only being able to pass to TEs & their run game not being very good has really angered & frustrated them a ton. The Bettendorf WR committing to us who is in the mold of a faster version of Lazard has sent them over the precipice. Can’t say I blame any WRs not wanting to play for Iowa.
 
PLUS: (possibly referenced within the thread, haven't made it all the way through):

ESPN Total BQ rating

17. Kyle Kempt
69. Nathan Stanley

I'm no expert about QBR calculation, but if the gap is that large — advantage Kempt.

28. Hornibrook
29. Shimonek
49. Thorson
54. Tanner Lee - NE
58. Sindelar - Purdue

Yeah, Stanley is great as is the Hock offense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GTO
Namely when one of the receptions for Wadley was a 68-yarder against powerhouse North Texas

Montgomery gained almost half of his rushing yards (550 out of 1146) on the season in 4 games against TTU, BU, Akron and WVU. Texas Tech was the strongest rushing defense of any of those 4 teams if that tells you anything.

The average ranking of those 4 teams rush defense is 90.

Texas Tech- 62
Baylor- 91
West Virginia- 103
Akron- 105
 
To answer your questions: Kyle Kempt is the best QB in the state

Seriously, why cant you answer the questions? Your only argument requires you to move the goalposts and claim moral victories. Never change, ISU fan...never change.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: breck53
Montgomery gained almost half of his rushing yards (550 out of 1146) on the season in 4 games against TTU, BU, Akron and WVU. Texas Tech was the strongest rushing defense of any of those 4 teams if that tells you anything.

The average ranking of those 4 teams rush defense is 90.

Texas Tech- 62
Baylor- 91
West Virginia- 103
Akron- 105
I think it's pretty safe to say that the ISU run-blocking OL was......not good. He rarely had holes to run through. Makes that 1,100 yard season that much more impressive.
 
I said total yards. Wadley is a complete back and dangerous out of the backfield as a receiver. Montgomery is pretty one dimensional and would be hard to trust during crunch time given he almost fumbled away a bowl victory.
How many fumbles did wadley have his first two years? How many did he lose? Answer 3/3. Montgomery has in his first two years 2/2. The stats between the two aren't even close. In wadley's first two he had a total of 7 for a total of 93 yards. Has had 49 in his first two for a total of 425 yards.
 
Daniels is going to announce his decision later in the week it sounds like.
 
I said total yards. Wadley is a complete back and dangerous out of the backfield as a receiver. Montgomery is pretty one dimensional and would be hard to trust during crunch time given he almost fumbled away a bowl victory.

Oh for crying out loud are you serious with this statement?? Did you even watch the bowl game? Kempt was given a high snap and barely got it to Montgomery who didn't have a great handle on the ball. He managed to score crossing the goal line, replay shows it was a TD, yet somehow the officials thought this was a fumble and failed to overturn an easy TD call. My hawk buddy even said this was a TD. So, he had 1 fumble on the year, which wasn't even a fumble and you want to come on here and say you don't trust a guy late in the game? I don't trust your judgement.
 
How many fumbles did wadley have his first two years? How many did he lose? Answer 3/3. Montgomery has in his first two years 2/2. The stats between the two aren't even close. In wadley's first two he had a total of 7 for a total of 93 yards. Has had 49 in his first two for a total of 425 yards.
The most ignorant post in this entire thread could be calling Montgomery one-dimensional.

Unreal.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron