I guess I thought it was mostly because whatever QB was playing either sucked or got injured. For example, Richardson started that Kansas game because someone got injured. Jantz was bad, so someone had to replace him. I didn't necessarily think he switched quarterbacks for fun, but maybe he did.
*RUMOR* why is Park taking a leave of absence?
- Thread starter Artic Zone
- Start date
I guess I thought it was mostly because whatever QB was playing either sucked or got injured. For example, Richardson started that Kansas game because someone got injured. Jantz was bad, so someone had to replace him. I didn't necessarily think he switched quarterbacks for fun, but maybe he did.
it appears Campbell choose his words pretty carefully.[/QUOTE]
I don't see how. He asked if he was suspended and he said he is not. If he said something like I can't comment on that, or didn't answer, then I would be suspicious.
Against the Sooners it isn't going to make much difference who is at QB.
I don't see how. He asked if he was suspended and he said he is not. If he said something like I can't comment on that, or didn't answer, then I would be suspicious.
Against the Sooners it isn't going to make much difference who is at QB.
I don't think it was for 'fun', it was just something he seemed to do just before the game, which would yield better results because the other team wasn't prepped for it.
Perfect example was Barnett's start at Tech in '11. No one even knew who he was but they ran basically what he did in high school so ISU was able to go crazy in Lubbock for a night. Barnett was also inserted unexpectedly at TCU in '12 for that win.
It was all very 'smoke and mirrors' or whatever because none of it was sustainable.
I don't see CMC going this route; if he does, people are right to question it.
He said he is not suspended from the team. Could be suspended for a game but still allowed to practice (part of the team yet). Could be other reasons someone doesn't travel and/or play also (health, personal, family concerns, etc.). I will be surprised if he plays.
Last edited:
He said he is not suspended from the team. Could be suspended for a game but still allowed to practice (part of the team yet). Could be other reasons someone doesn't travel and/or play also (health, personal, family concerns, etc.). I will be surprised if he plays.[/QUOTE]
I'm talking about what he said to the tribune.
Hint.... he did something(twice) that is legal in Colorado.
Unlike your run of the mill troll he at least qualified his post as *RUMOR* so that leads me to believe he's maybe not just trolling.
His ****** game would have been a good day for some of our former QBs. 50% completions with zero help and 246 yards. He was far from the only guy who looked like crap and he was the only guy who made any sort of special play with the exception of the Murdock catch. No, he wasn't good, but to make it sound as if he was just standing back there missing everyone is ridiculous.
In a way I hope he is.
1. It will prevent him from getting injured during a beat-down.
2. We can see what is behind him.
It's not like we are going to beat Oklahoma with or without him.
1. It will prevent him from getting injured during a beat-down.
2. We can see what is behind him.
It's not like we are going to beat Oklahoma with or without him.
Hoping for your captain and starting QB to sit out a game due to violation of team rules is a bold strategy
Pretty sure it's the 3rd time. FIrst time warning. SEcond time 1 game (3 for BB) and 3rd, you get booted.
Yes, it's great to have your starting QB and team captain suspended mid season for breaking rules. "At least he won't get hurt" is such a loser mentality.
Can someone on the inside just ask MC point blank if Park will be playing on Saturday? This shouldn't be that hard.